How to be just?
The concept of justice has experienced an unprecedented boom in recent decades, not only in applied philosophy, but also in political discourse. Demands for justice permeate almost all the important areas of social and political debate. Social, intergenerational, and climate justice, for example, are key ethical ideals that challenge present-day governance structures and systems.
Research Objectives Concepts of Justice in Global Comparison: Justice between Universal Validity Claims and Cultural Conditioning
Established in May 2022, the research group will at first identify specific fields of investigation, where the respective concepts of justice will be studied. These will include, amongst others:
- different historical periods in Europe, starting with Antiquity,
- religious justice concepts in comparison,
- various practices of social and cultural coexistence in European and non-European societies,
- issues of environment and climate.
In order to specify and substantiate the fields of investigation, an inaugural in-house workshop has taken place in November 2022. This will be followed by a series of public and semi-public events. In addition, publications are planned.
While the Christian tradition (e.g. Thomas Aquinas) took up Plato´s and Aristotle´s concept of justice as part of social ethics, the social philosophy of the Enlightenment emphasised questions of institutional prerequisites for the possibility of justice, without, however, discarding the cardinal rule of the suum cuique (‘to each their own’) of the ancient and Christian tradition as formative premise. Only with the resurgence of justice discourses in the wake of John Rawls and his book A Theory of Justice, which shaped the modern debates, did aspects of procedural justice gain centre stage.
The ongoing debate on ‘global justice’ takes up these discourses and asks, whether at all or to what extent validity claims of specific justice postulates can be meaningfully raised beyond the boundaries of particular, historically evolved traditional communities - claims that are certainly denied by communitarian philosophies. What remains largely unheeded in these debates is the fundamental question, whether the central categories of contemporary justice debates, which are rooted in the theological and philosophical traditions of European intellectual history, are actually compatible with a global perspective. Attempts at an intercultural comparative study of justice concepts have so far barely progressed beyond the first initiatory steps.
And yet, a cursory review of the, albeit limited, body of relevant work shows that thinking in terms of justice categories does indeed seem to be something of a universal constant beyond all cultural differentiation. At the same time, however, from a systematically comparative perspective we know very little about the concrete norms of the respective justice concepts in different cultures. There seem to be certain similarities across many cultures with view to the close bond between concepts of justice and models of sociality, and the idea of ‘to each their own’, but at the same time these premises are substantiated concretely by very different forms of manifestation in detail.
The vivid multidisciplinarity of the Academy promises to be particularly conducive for an exemplary in-depth analysis from an intercultural comparative perspective. The variety of specific disciplinary approaches allows to address widely distinct tones and nuances that characterise the negotiation of justice issues in different cultures and communities. At present, the cultural range covered by the group includes Europe, the Islamic region, India, and Africa.
- WS 2022/23: Lecture series on concepts of justice in different cultural contexts for the working group only
- 2023: Workshop with international guests to discuss ideas of justice in global comparison
- Autumn 2023: Participation in the Academy Day of the Union of Academies in Berlin on the topic ‘How to be just? Concepts of Justice in Global Comparison´
- 2023/2024: Lecture series with both in-house and external academic speakers for the general public
- 2024: International workshop on concepts of justice
- 2025: Conference ‘Concepts of Justice in Global Comparison’
- 2026: Book publication (anthology)
Members of the Working Group
|Prof. Dr. Gabriele Clemens||Modern Western European History and European Integration History|
|Prof. Dr. Philippe Depreux||Geschichtswissenschaften|
|Dr. Hermann Diebel-Fischer||Theologie|
|Dr. Anne Dienelt||Legal Studies / Public Law / International Law|
|Dr. Vincent Gengnagel||Soziologie|
|Prof. Dr. Silke Göttsch-Elten||European Ethnology / Folklore|
|Spokesperson||Prof. Dr. Anna Margaretha Horatschek||English Literature|
|Prof. Dr. Ulrike Jekutsch||Slawische Literaturwissenschaft|
|Jun. Prof. Dr. Franziska Neumann||Geschichtswissenschaften|
|Acting Spokesperson||Prof. Dr. Stefan Oeter||Deutsches und ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht|
|Prof. Dr. Anja Pistor-Hatam||Islamwissenschaft|
|Prof. Dr. Angelika Redder||Germanic Linguistics and General Linguistics|
|Prof. Dr. Dr. Dr. h. c. Johannes Schilling||Kirchen- und Dogmengeschichte|
|Dr. Alexander Stark||Rechtswissenschaften|
|Prof. Dr. Christine Straehle||Philosophy|
|Prof. Dr. Dana-Sophia Valentiner||Rechtswissenschaften|
|Dr. Colin von Negenborn||Philosophy|
|Jun. Prof. Dr. Stephanie Zehnle||Geschichtswissenschaften|
|Dr. Larissa Zwar||Psychology|